Tag Archives: Web page

How to Collect the Images and Meta Tags from a Webpage with PHP

micro tutorial, PHP, web development, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Meta Tags and the Facebook Example

You’ve definitely seen the “share a link” screen in Facebook. When you paste a link into the box (fig. 1) and press the “Attach” button you’ll get the prompted cite parsed with a title, description and possibly thumb (fig. 2). This functionality is well known in Facebook, but it appears to be well known also in various social services. In fact Linkedin, Reddit, Dzone‘s bookmarklet use it.

Facebook Attach a Link Prompt Screen
fig. 1 - Facebook Attach a Link Prompt Screen

Fist thing to notice is that this information, prompted by Facebook, is the same as the meta tag information. However there is a slight difference.

Facebook Attached Link Screen
fig. 2 - Facebook Attached Link Screen

Facebook prefers for the thumb the image set into the <meta property=”og:image” … />. In the case above this tag appears to be:

<meta property="og:image" content="http://b.vimeocdn.com/ts/572/975/57297584_200.jpg" />

And the image pointed in the SRC attribute is exactly the same as the one prompted by Facebook (fig. 3).

Vimeo Thumb
fig. 3 - Vimeo Thumb

First thing to note is that the real thumb is bigger than the thumb shown in Facebook, so Facebook resizes it and the second thing to note is that there are more meta tags of the og:… format. Continue reading How to Collect the Images and Meta Tags from a Webpage with PHP →

Use Cookie-Free Domain and CDN for Static Content!

web development, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Benefits from Cookie-Free Domains

Lately most of the web developers are talking more and more about optimization. One of the practices everybody’s supporting is to use cookie free domains for static content. First of all, what’s static content. That, in breve, are all images, JavaScripts and CSS. That’s everything that’s transmitted to the client with no change from the server at all. In a typical PHP/MySQL site everything generated on the server site is considered dynamic, while every component that’s given to the client with no change is static. That’s why they don’t need cookies in the request.

That’s what Yahoo! YSlow says:

In a short example, lets say you’ve a web page with 10 background images used by its CSS file. Here’s a good practice to combine them in one or even use base64 for them, but that’s another talk. So in that scenario you’ll send all the cookies you’ve on the site with this images, but actually they don’t profit at all from this. The question is why you should send all this data with no need? Won’t you benefit from sending it with no cookies.

As it sound logical I read some articles recently describing that the benefit from putting the static content on a non-cookie domain doesn’t pays back. OK it may be strange, however every 40 ms or whatever of page load is important, aren’t they?

Setup a Cookie Free Domain

The problem is that if you’d like to setup a cookie free domain the things are becoming a bit harder. You’ve two options:

  1. Move all your static content on a different domain, where no cookies are set.
  2. Move your static content on a different sub domain and set all the cookies to the www subdomain. (Here’s a bit tricky).

All this indeed a bit tricky! So let me proceed with the next topic.

Benefits from CDN

A CDN or Content Delivery Network is a term become famous with the growing web. Now big sites have servers in almost every continent and perhaps country. CDN is an abstraction of all this. The good thing is that there’s supposed to be stored static content. Think about the YouTube’s video files. Another good thing is that this domains are cookie free by default. The thing is …

Why don’t You Combine Them?

You’ll benefit from both ideas. Cookie free domains with CDN. In one side the web page will benefit from the closest location of the server and the CDN and in other side all this will come with no cookies to you. That’s really nice and most of the time people thing of CDN for only storing large scale data, such as video files, but no one says you cannot put your CSS, JavaScripts and background images there!

CSS sprites. Go beyond the limits with base64!

css, micro tutorial, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Why should I optimize CSS?

In fact how and why should I optimize CSS is the right question. Actually CSS is simply one ore more files loaded from the server to the client, usually a browser, with CSS specific rules that must be applied by the browser to the web page you’re seeing. That’s in general. Of course there are exceptions when CSS can be inline or added directly to the HTML tags, which is bad practice because thus the HTML markup becomes larger and even worse the browser cannot cache it and than load it quickly. In fact that’s why usually the CSS of a web page is put in one single file. Primary because that makes only one request to the server and in second hand because it can be cached by the browser.

Just because the nature of the CSS is that firstly it’s loaded and than executed one of the primary techniques of optimizing it is to make it smaller and therefore load faster. There are several methods of doing so. Enabling GZIP support of the web server and minifying the file are the most common ones. But one of the tricks you cannot optimizing just for second is using the so called CSS sprites.

CSS sprites

What are these? To answer this question I’ll simply try to give you an example. Let’s assume there are three CSS classes each one with its own background image. This makes four requests to the server. One for the CSS file and one per every background image. But what we’d like to achieve is to make less requests as we can. Than one of the things we can do is to make one single image and to change only the background-position CSS property to position it on the right place and to make it appear correctly.

Be careful! When you join all of the images into one single CSS sprite you may add one class with that background-image and every other class with only background-position property. Than every DOM element with that background must have both class names. Only than you can be sure the server will make two requests. One for the CSS file and one for the sprite.

base64 to encode images

In other hand most of the web projects are pretty big, and unfortunately it’s too difficult to make only one single sprite just because it’s too difficult to manage it after the project has become very large. That’s why mostly in the practice there are several sprites for the main components. But the problem is that again there are more HTTP requests.

Is there any way to make only one request?

Yes there is. Simply by converting your CSS sprite into a base64 encoded image. In breve base64 is an encoding where you can practically make any data into a string. Thus the image can be represented by a string containing the same information as the image. Hopefully most of the browser, except of course MSIE, does read the so called data urls, or:

<img src="data:image/png;base64,..... " />

and that’s enough to get started with base64 and the single request. The sprite has become a string!

CSS and base64

The natural question is now how to merge all this? You now have one CSS file with one or more sprites. Than you can convert them into a base64 encoded strings and put them all into the CSS.

There is a problem, of course, what happens with MSIE. As I said before MSIE doesn’t read base64 encoded images. Hopefully there is a solution described very well by Stoyan Stefanov in his blog post here.

Finally …

now there is only one request and everything works pretty fine. This technique can be really helpful to someone who’s trying to optimize the CSS performance to the limits.

What’s groovy in Firebug 1.5

web development, , , , , ,

Now Firebug 1.5 is out in the wild. What really impressed me is the significant difference between the last version and the really user friendly interface it gives.

One of my favorite features is that you can now sort the different columns in the Net panel. Now you can clearly see what’s the biggest component and what makes more traffic. This helps a lot once you decide to optimize the web page you’re watching.

Another good tool is that you can see the computed style, which however is only for Firefox and gives you partial information about all styles in different browsers, but it’s useful though.

I was pretty impressed by this version and I’d like to recommend it!

Faster HTML! Why not?

web development, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Although I’ve read so many articles about web page optimization there’s not so much about optimizing HTML.

Why?

Maybe because nobody things that the HTML source of a page can be optimized or the optimization of it cannot bring some benefit to the page load experience. I don’t thing so. If something can be optimized, even if this does not give you so much, why you shouldn’t do it?

How to optimize such thing as HTML?

Well there are few things you should do and other that can speed up a little bit but you should not.

1. Enable gzip

What is gzip? Well in breve everything the server generates is sent back to the client in text format. You’ve to possibilities to send it. Either compressed or uncompressed. As you may guess the compressed format is a lot faster than uncompressed. In fact to make it work that way you’d need to enable gzip which is supported by the web server. In the case of Apache web server this can be done by enabling mod_deflate. Take a look of mod_deflated and mod_inflate. This two modules gives you the possibility to make your site a lot faster and the good news is that this is done without a single line change. The bad news, as always there’s a bad news, is that sometimes this cannot help a visitor, simply because his browser doesn’t support such corresponding with the server. According to a research I’ve read recently almost 15% of the web browsers doesn’t support gzip. Sometimes the reason is old browser versions, sometimes because the state policy doesn’t allow it. However this is the first thing you should do to speed up your HTML even it is not related directly to HTML scripts. By the way this will speed up everything which is sent back to the client, especially CSS and JavaScript files and in the case of JavaScript this can improve dramatically the user experience. Continue reading Faster HTML! Why not? →