<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>yui &#8211; stoimen&#039;s web log</title>
	<atom:link href="/tag/yui/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>on web development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 08:18:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Google Closure Compiler?</title>
		<link>/2010/01/18/google-closure-compiler/</link>
		<comments>/2010/01/18/google-closure-compiler/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 10:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stoimen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Googles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[JavaScript programming language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jquery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[openlayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology/Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yui]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, it’s a question! After reading about jQuery version 1.4 I saw something that seemed to be pretty interesting to me. jQuery is now using Google Closure Compiler to minify and compile it’s source. The result was smaller output file. Now I’m using YUI Compressor for my project and when I decided to make an &#8230; <a href="/2010/01/18/google-closure-compiler/" class="more-link">Continue reading <span class="screen-reader-text">Google Closure Compiler?</span> <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href="/2010/01/20/google-closure-compiler-doesnt-work/" rel="bookmark" title="Google Closure Compiler doesn&#8217;t work?!">Google Closure Compiler doesn&#8217;t work?! </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/01/08/jquery-vs-pure-javascript/" rel="bookmark" title="jQuery vs. pure JavaScript">jQuery vs. pure JavaScript </a></li>
<li><a href="/2009/03/19/jquery-ui/" rel="bookmark" title="JQuery UI">JQuery UI </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/01/31/speed-up-the-javascript-it-can-change-dramatically-the-user-experience/" rel="bookmark" title="Speed up the JavaScript. It can change dramatically the user experience.">Speed up the JavaScript. It can change dramatically the user experience. </a></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it’s a question! After reading about jQuery version 1.4 I saw something that seemed to be pretty interesting to me. jQuery is now using Google Closure Compiler to minify and compile it’s source. The result was smaller output file.</p>
<p>Now I’m using YUI Compressor for my project and when I decided to make an experiment with Googles’ software it was just because I’d like to gain loading savings. In the project I’m working on I use two famous JavaScript libraries: jQuery and OpenLayers, and the result was really good. The compiled code was smaller than the YUI compressed source and the savings where more than 50% for non-gzipped requests.</p>
<p>The problem is that the resulting code, even successfully compiled after what Google said, was producing errors on the site and wasn’t working correctly. That why I’m leaving the title as a question and I’ll continue my experiments with this approach until I get any good results.</p>
<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>
<p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href="/2010/01/20/google-closure-compiler-doesnt-work/" rel="bookmark" title="Google Closure Compiler doesn&#8217;t work?!">Google Closure Compiler doesn&#8217;t work?! </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/01/08/jquery-vs-pure-javascript/" rel="bookmark" title="jQuery vs. pure JavaScript">jQuery vs. pure JavaScript </a></li>
<li><a href="/2009/03/19/jquery-ui/" rel="bookmark" title="JQuery UI">JQuery UI </a></li>
<li><a href="/2010/01/31/speed-up-the-javascript-it-can-change-dramatically-the-user-experience/" rel="bookmark" title="Speed up the JavaScript. It can change dramatically the user experience.">Speed up the JavaScript. It can change dramatically the user experience. </a></li>
</ol></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/2010/01/18/google-closure-compiler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JQuery UI</title>
		<link>/2009/03/19/jquery-ui/</link>
		<comments>/2009/03/19/jquery-ui/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 05:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stoimen]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jquery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ui]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yui]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't use and write components and UI libraries when there are already such a good number of them online. My recommendation is JQuery UI.<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>

Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href="/2010/01/15/jquery-1-4-released/" rel="bookmark" title="jQuery 1.4 released">jQuery 1.4 released </a></li>
<li><a href="/2009/11/13/writing-a-jquery-plugin-part-1-good-practices/" rel="bookmark" title="Writing a jQuery plugin &#8211; (part 1). Good practices!">Writing a jQuery plugin &#8211; (part 1). Good practices! </a></li>
<li><a href="/2009/05/25/remove-dom-element-with-jquery/" rel="bookmark" title="Remove DOM Element with JQuery">Remove DOM Element with JQuery </a></li>
<li><a href="/2009/11/11/jquery-css-functions-part-2-width-and-height/" rel="bookmark" title="jQuery CSS functions. Part 2 &#8211; width() and height()">jQuery CSS functions. Part 2 &#8211; width() and height() </a></li>
</ol>
</div>
]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a very good library of UI functionality coming with <a title="JQuery" href="http://jquery.com/" target="_blank">JQuery</a>, the famous JavaScript library. The UI reference can be found <a title="JQuery UI reference" href="http://docs.jquery.com/UI" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>Giving an extream power to use the user interface on it&#8217;s limits, with functionalities as drag and drop, resize, select, sort, etc.</p>
<p>This subset of the JQuery library can be used with very small code includes, and that makes the ease of use even more. Actually I think that library is really more easy to use than any other as SPRY, YUI, etc.</p>
<p>I recommend it!</p>
<div class='yarpp-related-rss'>
<p>Related posts:<ol>
<li><a href="/2010/01/15/jquery-1-4-released/" rel="bookmark" title="jQuery 1.4 released">jQuery 1.4 released </a></li>
<li><a href="/2009/11/13/writing-a-jquery-plugin-part-1-good-practices/" rel="bookmark" title="Writing a jQuery plugin &#8211; (part 1). Good practices!">Writing a jQuery plugin &#8211; (part 1). Good practices! </a></li>
<li><a href="/2009/05/25/remove-dom-element-with-jquery/" rel="bookmark" title="Remove DOM Element with JQuery">Remove DOM Element with JQuery </a></li>
<li><a href="/2009/11/11/jquery-css-functions-part-2-width-and-height/" rel="bookmark" title="jQuery CSS functions. Part 2 &#8211; width() and height()">jQuery CSS functions. Part 2 &#8211; width() and height() </a></li>
</ol></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>/2009/03/19/jquery-ui/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
